We've got our eye on you.
The most controversial thing about a Pokémon TCG website is its content. Be it free, paid, or paid for by the glory of Google Ads, we’re always reading it…Observing it…
…And criticizing it.
Be it constructive (“I think X person could have made Y article better by implementing/removing z element”), or just downright nasty (“you suck!”), it’s always happening. I see it all the time on SixPrizes.com, as well as my own site, HeyTrainer.org. The main point of this article is constructiveness: me treating fellow authors with respect for their hard work.
However, I’d like to give my readers their subscriptions’ worth, so rather than just criticize, I’ll be offering alternative ideas, as well as some miscellaneous deck lists near the end (since the latter are just devices to illustrate certain points, they won’t be full-blown articles in themselves).
I will be examining SixPrizes.com main site articles only; articles seen by the public. Even though this is analysis of material you aren’t paying for, it helps your City Championship preparation by analyzing what these authors are saying – what’s a winning strategy? What’s valid?
