Please login or register in order to rate this article.

You should write for 6P! Click here to get started...

Like Us!

Commenting Etiquette

Be cool. That's all we ask. The writers and editors put a lot of time into bringing you these articles, so show some respect. It's ok to be critical, but please be civil about it. Don't embarrass yourself in front of everyone by making juvenile remarks because you may regret it later. If you have issue with someone, "Get a room." Nobody wants to see your childish back-and-forth banter. Think twice before commenting, use proper grammar, HAVE FUN, and thanks for adding to the conversation!

  • Jonathan

    “For more advanced players, you may just want to skip this article as it won’t do much for you apart from being a review of what you already know.”

    Sadly, I’m starting to think this is true of almost every article on this site.

    • Travis

      Unless you wanna pay a fee every month…

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000437572230 Brenden Clark

        Agreed, the last day to get a free account didn’t work for me. I tried the next day and had the EXACT same username and email the day before and it let me signed up. It would’ve been nice to have a free account.

      • http://www.adamcapriola.com/ Adam Capriola

        Everyone was given ample time (5 days) to sign up for the free trials (which are over now anyway). If you had an issue, you could have e-mailed me about it and I would have helped you out.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XVNTS6D43ALI4GW74Q22WXNPZU Red Ados

        I like this site and I have learned a lot from it. Lately, I have been dissapointed because all of the very good writers are Underground writers and all of the articles that hook me are underground articles. I liked sixprizes because it was free (not to be a cheapskate or anything). And I can’t have an Underground account because
        A: I am a 13 year old and I have no money
        B: My parents don’t know I have a sixprizes account which leads up to
        C: I can’t have a PayPal account or a credit card.

        Sixprizes was my favorite website until Underground started. All of the amazing writers and deck-builders are UnderGround writers and all of the sub-par (or less revealing of secret stuff) writers are staff writers. I haven’t seen any articles by J-wittz recently other than vids. When I saw that an article was going ot come out called the “LuxChomp Bible” I was so excited. Then I saw that it (and all of the other good articles for the next month) was/were Underground. That stopped me in my tracks. I just feel so frustrated and I may switch completely to PokeGym because it’s becomin too much. I don’t know how to make a good ChampPhan deck because it was an Underground article. The Non-Underground article about Machamp was informative, except for my list was (in my opinion) better and more solid. The only major change was adding one Machamp Prime, and the writer himself said that he didn’t have much info or practice with/about Triumphant. All I have to look at now is the n00b list on pokegym and the joke/spammed-up threads on heytrainer, whereas as soon as Triumphant came out there immediately was an Underground article on ChampPhan. I miss the old SixPrizes.

      • http://www.adamcapriola.com/ Adam Capriola

        I understand your frustration… unfortunately we can’t make Underground available for everyone. It’s impossible for us to make everyone happy (though I wish I could).

        What exactly do you mean by “old SixPrizes”? I just don’t know what you mean… none of the Underground writers were writing anything for the site anyway before it started, and we’ve cut down on weak articles making it to the site. I think a lot of people are misremembering how things were before.

        Look through the archives and let me know what kind of things you are missing: http://www.sixprizes.com/archives/

        I just don’t understand what everyone is missing… maybe I’m nearsighted, I dunno. Nobody is really giving any concrete examples of things they want or wish we were doing again.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000437572230 Brenden Clark

        Oh. I should’ve done that.

    • http://www.adamcapriola.com/ Adam Capriola

      Ok… what kind of articles do you (or anyone else) want to see?

      • Anonymous

        Something creative… From a different point of view… I don’t know, just throwing out ideas…

      • http://www.adamcapriola.com/ Adam Capriola

        Be more specific, I don’t know what you mean by “something creative.” That’s a very broad suggestion… are you talking about deck ideas or creative writing like smitham9 does? Or something else?

        And just to be somewhat cynical, nobody will ever share any “different” deck ideas that have if they’re good (at least on the free portion of the site).

        Any creative decks ideas that make it to the site are pretty much guaranteed to be bad… nobody is going to share their secret deck they’ve been working on for a tournament. Unless you want to read about Water Ho-Oh and Ratty Ratty Bug, then I’m not sure what to do.

        Would YOU (speaking in a general term) be willing to share a great new creative idea to everyone if you thought it was any good, and could possibly be a tournament winning idea? I doubt it…

      • http://www.facebook.com/Poly550 Cam Graybill

        tony (smithham9) definetaly writes the best quality, and the funniest articles on the site, i think he should write more… or maybe even be an underground writer

      • Jonathan

        I was being a bit harsh. I generally enjoy reading the articles here. I just don’t feel any better of a player than I was before reading any of the articles. This is probably because I have a strong breadth of knowledge of the game and consider myself a pretty good deck builder. My primary weakness is a lack of familiarity with how to play and play against particular decks, which is something you can really only get from playtesting. An article can supplement deck building and general play, but familiarity with a particular deck is difficult to get without playing at least a few matches both with and against the deck.

        As far as Underground articles, if I used them just for upping my game, I would just scroll down to the decklist to see what tech they played that differentiated them, and that would be the bulk of what I’d want to know. In some cases just the name of a single card. But as it turns out, most of the underground authors are people I know personally, and I like reading their stuff. Be that as it may, I think that only maybe one of the Underground articles posted to date told me something I didn’t already know.

        What this basically means is that for me the site is a place to go that has good articles, but not an indispensable resource like it may be for some newer players to whom the value of many of these articles would be very high.

        As for what I would like to see more of, my favorite are probably articles with an in-depth analysis of a particular deck with in-depth analysis of how match-ups play out. These are usually the most interesting and enjoyable from my perspective.

      • http://www.adamcapriola.com/ Adam Capriola

        You’re going to be hard pressed to find articles anywhere with in-depth analysis and match-up guides. It takes a lot of time to gain competency at those kinds of things and most people won’t want to share that kind of stuff, unfortunately. :(

        Next month (I hope) we will start recording Apprentice/Redshark matches for Underground members, so I think you might like those. I bought some people mics and we need to get everyone hooked up with software, but basically we’ll start recording matches and the guys will explain their moves while they play. It should be pretty interesting. :)

      • Jonathan

        I guess what I’m saying then is that things that don’t take lots of time to gain competency at aren’t of value to me in articles, because I’m highly competent at the rest :p

        Recorded redshark/appr matches would be cool. That’s definitely a good idea. Gosh, I need to find some people to play against for that matter. I haven’t played a game of Pokemon over the Internet in years.

  • Anonymous

    THIS IS THE BEST SITE IN THE WORLD STOP HATING

  • Anonymous

    I like this deck building break down process. I might not agree with how the deck would look like 9 energies seems really low, but I know that is through different play styles and personal comfort.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001734489773 Dakota Streck

      This list was in no way meant to be a good, playable list. Instead, it was just to provide an example of how the process works.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Martin-Garcia/676689170 Martin Garcia

    Come on guys, stop the hating already. The article was good, maybe not the best about deck building (that would be “refine your playtesting” i really loved that one), but it certainly was good, so lets be fair with the writers.
    The article defined what a deck builder needs, how he needs it, the process of creating, play testing, teching, i think its good enough.
    I still didnt like the list at all, but i guess thats not really the point of this article, so i wont say anything about that.
    You did a good job here Dakota.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001734489773 Dakota Streck

    Ok, I can’t get my ‘puter to respond to each person’s post, so here’s my response to every1

    @Martin Garcia – Yeah, the list is not a great list, it was only meant to be a demonstration

    @Everyone Else – I’ve heard it a lot that people are thinking that the articles haven’t been as good since Underground and the Approved Contributors/Staff Writers have started and I partly agree with you. I understand that some of you feel that the site hasn’t been doing much for more advanced players lately because all the good stuff is Underground.

    I personally make sure that I don’t hold many “Secret” decks/techs/whatever back from you guys, if I figure out a really good idea, 99% of the time I’ll write an article on it.

    @Attackers on this article – Yeah, I admit that this wasn’t as good as my first SCT (school the competition) article, this article was aimed at beginners, which is something I don’t like to do.

    @A buncha People – My next STC article will go back to the pattern of the first one and will be about Gyarados and how how to play its match ups. I know some of you asked for match up guides, so I’m here to tell you that most of my STC articles will be about playing match ups and will be aimed much more advanced players than this article was.

    @Everyone – The best way to make the site better is to tell us what you want, if you don’t like something, let us know. However, please don’t just say “I liked the old 6p better”

    Tell us what you don’t like, what you do like, what could be made better. Be as specific as possible and, if able, give examples:

    Example:
    I didn’t like this article because it was written really boringly. An article that did a good job at that was this:
    Post link here

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001734489773 Dakota Streck

    Ok, I can’t get my ‘puter to respond to each person’s post, so here’s my response to every1

    @Martin Garcia – Yeah, the list is not a great list, it was only meant to be a demonstration

    @Everyone Else – I’ve heard it a lot that people are thinking that the articles haven’t been as good since Underground and the Approved Contributors/Staff Writers have started and I partly agree with you. I understand that some of you feel that the site hasn’t been doing much for more advanced players lately because all the good stuff is Underground.

    I personally make sure that I don’t hold many “Secret” decks/techs/whatever back from you guys, if I figure out a really good idea, 99% of the time I’ll write an article on it.

    @Attackers on this article – Yeah, I admit that this wasn’t as good as my first SCT (school the competition) article, this article was aimed at beginners, which is something I don’t like to do.

    @A buncha People – My next STC article will go back to the pattern of the first one and will be about Gyarados and how how to play its match ups. I know some of you asked for match up guides, so I’m here to tell you that most of my STC articles will be about playing match ups and will be aimed much more advanced players than this article was.

    @Everyone – The best way to make the site better is to tell us what you want, if you don’t like something, let us know. However, please don’t just say “I liked the old 6p better”

    Tell us what you don’t like, what you do like, what could be made better. Be as specific as possible and, if able, give examples:

    Example:
    I didn’t like this article because it was written really boringly. An article that did a good job at that was this:
    Post link here

  • 2decktom

    I think this article was great, and I am a little bit of a beginner, but this probably has helped a lot of people.

  • Pingback: How to School the Competition - MagneChamp