<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What kind of format do you prefer? &#8211; Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sixprizes.com/pokemon-card-polls/kind-format-prefer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/polls/kind-format-prefer/</link>
	<description>Share, read, and discuss Pokemon Trading Card Game tips and strategy with the SixPrizes community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakota Streck</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/polls/kind-format-prefer/#comment-24213</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakota Streck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/blog/?p=281#comment-24213</guid>
		<description>What about Eeveelutions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Eeveelutions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMGausch</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/polls/kind-format-prefer/#comment-4537</link>
		<dc:creator>SMGausch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/blog/?p=281#comment-4537</guid>
		<description>Jimbo thanks for posting, I never would have seen this otherwise. I like the format how it is now, with so many options. Last weekend I attended two CC&#039;s about 40 miles apart the decks that went 5-0/4-1 and places the 1st 1-4/3-2 the next. Anyone with a good list can do well with some luck in pairings and good play. This allows newer players to have a shot at doing well and you don&#039;t have to spend a ton of money on the main lines everyone else wants. I just think its good for the game, and The best players still find themselves at the top more than not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimbo thanks for posting, I never would have seen this otherwise. I like the format how it is now, with so many options. Last weekend I attended two CC&#8217;s about 40 miles apart the decks that went 5-0/4-1 and places the 1st 1-4/3-2 the next. Anyone with a good list can do well with some luck in pairings and good play. This allows newer players to have a shot at doing well and you don&#8217;t have to spend a ton of money on the main lines everyone else wants. I just think its good for the game, and The best players still find themselves at the top more than not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMGausch</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/polls/kind-format-prefer/#comment-16878</link>
		<dc:creator>SMGausch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/blog/?p=281#comment-16878</guid>
		<description>Jimbo thanks for posting, I never would have seen this otherwise. I like the format how it is now, with so many options. Last weekend I attended two CC&#039;s about 40 miles apart the decks that went 5-0/4-1 and places the 1st 1-4/3-2 the next. Anyone with a good list can do well with some luck in pairings and good play. This allows newer players to have a shot at doing well and you don&#039;t have to spend a ton of money on the main lines everyone else wants. I just think its good for the game, and The best players still find themselves at the top more than not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimbo thanks for posting, I never would have seen this otherwise. I like the format how it is now, with so many options. Last weekend I attended two CC&#8217;s about 40 miles apart the decks that went 5-0/4-1 and places the 1st 1-4/3-2 the next. Anyone with a good list can do well with some luck in pairings and good play. This allows newer players to have a shot at doing well and you don&#8217;t have to spend a ton of money on the main lines everyone else wants. I just think its good for the game, and The best players still find themselves at the top more than not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMGausch</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/polls/kind-format-prefer/#comment-16879</link>
		<dc:creator>SMGausch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/blog/?p=281#comment-16879</guid>
		<description>Jimbo thanks for posting, I never would have seen this otherwise. I like the format how it is now, with so many options. Last weekend I attended two CC&#039;s about 40 miles apart the decks that went 5-0/4-1 and places the 1st 1-4/3-2 the next. Anyone with a good list can do well with some luck in pairings and good play. This allows newer players to have a shot at doing well and you don&#039;t have to spend a ton of money on the main lines everyone else wants. I just think its good for the game, and The best players still find themselves at the top more than not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimbo thanks for posting, I never would have seen this otherwise. I like the format how it is now, with so many options. Last weekend I attended two CC&#8217;s about 40 miles apart the decks that went 5-0/4-1 and places the 1st 1-4/3-2 the next. Anyone with a good list can do well with some luck in pairings and good play. This allows newer players to have a shot at doing well and you don&#8217;t have to spend a ton of money on the main lines everyone else wants. I just think its good for the game, and The best players still find themselves at the top more than not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/polls/kind-format-prefer/#comment-4533</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/blog/?p=281#comment-4533</guid>
		<description>I love a very narrow format of decks, allows interesting techs and unique blends from every player.
(FIRST COMMENT ON THIS POST FOR 6 MONTHS)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love a very narrow format of decks, allows interesting techs and unique blends from every player.<br />
(FIRST COMMENT ON THIS POST FOR 6 MONTHS)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/polls/kind-format-prefer/#comment-16875</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/blog/?p=281#comment-16875</guid>
		<description>I love a very narrow format of decks, allows interesting techs and unique blends from every player.
(FIRST COMMENT ON THIS POST FOR 6 MONTHS)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love a very narrow format of decks, allows interesting techs and unique blends from every player.<br />
(FIRST COMMENT ON THIS POST FOR 6 MONTHS)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/polls/kind-format-prefer/#comment-16876</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/blog/?p=281#comment-16876</guid>
		<description>I love a very narrow format of decks, allows interesting techs and unique blends from every player.
(FIRST COMMENT ON THIS POST FOR 6 MONTHS)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love a very narrow format of decks, allows interesting techs and unique blends from every player.<br />
(FIRST COMMENT ON THIS POST FOR 6 MONTHS)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolCallum</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/polls/kind-format-prefer/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>CoolCallum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/blog/?p=281#comment-864</guid>
		<description>I liked the format with the team rocket set in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the format with the team rocket set in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolCallum</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/polls/kind-format-prefer/#comment-16873</link>
		<dc:creator>CoolCallum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/blog/?p=281#comment-16873</guid>
		<description>I liked the format with the team rocket set in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the format with the team rocket set in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolCallum</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/polls/kind-format-prefer/#comment-16874</link>
		<dc:creator>CoolCallum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/blog/?p=281#comment-16874</guid>
		<description>I liked the format with the team rocket set in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the format with the team rocket set in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

