Please login or register in order to rate this article.

You should write for 6P! Click here to get started...

Like Us!

Commenting Etiquette

Be cool. That's all we ask. The writers and editors put a lot of time into bringing you these articles, so show some respect. It's ok to be critical, but please be civil about it. Don't embarrass yourself in front of everyone by making juvenile remarks because you may regret it later. If you have issue with someone, "Get a room." Nobody wants to see your childish back-and-forth banter. Think twice before commenting, use proper grammar, HAVE FUN, and thanks for adding to the conversation!

  • apb58

     I’m confused why you say “there’s no need for judge because of trickery”.
     Let’s say they had a 6 card hand. Play trickery, goes down to 5; with a weavile drop it’s down to 4, and with ambipom, it’s down to 2.

    With Judge, they go down to 4, Weavile drop gives them 3, Ambipom gives them 1.

    I think Judge is the superior play, even if trickery gives you a little draw.

    Also, why no slowking? When they have no hand, it’s up to you to make sure it stays that way with dead draws!

  • Anonymous

    Well, I doubt people are going to completely change their deck because Ambipom/Weavile got 6th place. I would’ve liked a deeper analysis on your lists– especially since Alaric’s AmbiVile deck DID NOT have any cleffa in it.
    http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=150321

  • Anonymous

    oh, I guess somebody already posted it and beat me to the punch : P

  • Anonymous

    This article seemed pretty rushed, it seemed like you talked briefly about Yanmega and Disruption and then shoved two lists down your throat.

  • Anonymous

    This article seemed pretty rushed, it seemed like you talked briefly about Yanmega and Disruption and then shoved two lists down your throat.

    • A Z

      I agree the lists arent even that good…

    • A Z

      I agree the lists arent even that good…

  • Anonymous

    Sorry, but this article was rushed.  I don’t think that you had any time to get any research done about the deck that he was using, as phou pointed out in the comments.  You did not allow a full-flourishing explaination of how the deck works, and you barely talked about any of the matchups.  I can understand the lack of testing, but theorymon would have been good enough for the short amount of time that we had with the concept.

  • Anonymous

     I like the general concept of these decks but I would have liked a better explanation of the two deck lists. I think that judge would help the ambipom/weavile as explained by apb58 in his comment below.

  • Anonymous

    Does this mean if i wanna win nationals i should run 4 junipers, 4 oaks, 4 copycats, and 4 judges cause weavile and ambipom is gonna say no to my hand? ha ha ha ridiculous.

    This deck just got lucky at nationals cause it was new and no one knew what was the threat. 

    Bouffalant with a double colorless already benched {easy to get out} can revenge KO ambipom and if another come out then the second attack will KO that one.

    The bull is the answer to almost every low hp deck.

     

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KO5BBYJBX7UP7O2DCX7KYPJASY greg

    i may be wrong. but doesnt flower shop lady only put back only basic energies. and it has to be 3 and 3?