Please login or register in order to rate this article.

You should write for 6P! Click here to get started...

Like Us!

Commenting Etiquette

Be cool. That's all we ask. The writers and editors put a lot of time into bringing you these articles, so show some respect. It's ok to be critical, but please be civil about it. Don't embarrass yourself in front of everyone by making juvenile remarks because you may regret it later. If you have issue with someone, "Get a room." Nobody wants to see your childish back-and-forth banter. Think twice before commenting, use proper grammar, HAVE FUN, and thanks for adding to the conversation!

  • Pikey

    “As said by the author of “Legend Box Bonanza”, this attack deserves to be announced with a loudspeaker.”

    I see that you have also seen the light! :D

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XVNTS6D43ALI4GW74Q22WXNPZU Red Ados

      I know. Every time I read that attack I want to just Y E L L I T!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=543741636 Jason Windham

    No smeargle, bro? Bad.

  • 2decktom

    Great deck analysis! Are you sure it wasn’t Math on Tuesday? ;)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Bae/583235222 Peter Bae

    You really didnt explain the cards to its full detail. For instance, you could of gone more in depth about KGL rather than talking about why 3-1 than 2-2.

  • Anonymous

    why no legend box?

  • Anonymous

    why no legend box?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XVNTS6D43ALI4GW74Q22WXNPZU Red Ados

      The point of this deck is consistency. Legend Box can be consistent with Dialga PL and/or Delcatty PL, but that takes up too much bench space, and removes consistency.

      • Anonymous

        that’s stupid.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XVNTS6D43ALI4GW74Q22WXNPZU Red Ados

        I’ve tested both. I said in the article that you can use whichever one you feel comfortable with.

      • Anonymous

        what the hell is that supposed to mean?

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/pgmcsskater pgmcsskater

    i like the idea of 3-1 …. nice very nice.

  • Anonymous

    “was confused the first time I saw somebody using a 3-1, but now I get it. When your KGL is knocked out, you bring up your Uxie with free retreat (thanks to Unown Q), use Pokémon Rescue, get back the bottom half, and play it with your top half that you have in your hand onto the bench”

    How is this any different than running a 2-2 and doing the same thing? This doesn’t increase your odds of having one in hand, you can only have 4 total either way. So, either way, you are planning to have a rescue in hand with 1 half and either way you can rescue the other half regardless of whether you run a 2-2 or a 3-1 line.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Bae/583235222 Peter Bae

      look if your running 2-2 this is what ahppens
      you have 1 in play, which means 1-1 is left inthe deck. KGL in play gets knocked out. now you have to fish for a rescue and 1 card out of the deck where as to 3-1, you will have 2 of the top pieces left in the deck to fish out and all the rescues, so the odds of receovery is higher

      • Anonymous

        Fail

  • Anonymous

    Ahh great.. the 2-2 vs 3-1 Legend argument again. I think it makes no sense not to just run 2-2. Also, late game Legend Box is too good not to use. Just 2. No biggie. Add a Smeargle because you already have Q. Get the most out of your ‘Mon.

  • http://twitter.com/cabd55 Zackary Ayello

    No love for everyone’s favorite finned floatzel GL lvl x? Then you don’t have to worry about getting it from the discard, you just play it back down!

  • Anonymous

    2-2 is better then 3-1, no disrespect given to the author.

    I heard why people like 3-1 better, but 2-2 is just the bomb.

    • Anonymous

      I like your reasoning

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Martin-Garcia/676689170 Martin Garcia

    Dragon rush your uxies? Use a 60 hitting pkmn to attack SP who can heal and poketurn?
    Not to mention luxray will brightlook the KGL for 2 prizes everytime you play it, and dialga will just remove lost KGL´s energies.
    I dont want to pick a fight, but you obviously dont know how to play SP, or how to play against it, sure, this deck is cool, but the match ups are wrong.

  • Travis

    “Deafen Lock is tough but if you can get off a couple of “Mega Tidal Wave”s you have a good chance. Feraligatr is also helpful here and beware of “Dragon Rush”!”

    Lol, so attack a lot, and watch out for attacks? Best deck match up analysis ever XD.

  • http://www.facebook.com/nharp0386 Nick Harper

    I’ve been working with a deck like this, but mine is based more on early-game disruption (a variation of Bullados’s list) since this deck usually takes a few turns to get going. It’s tons of fun to play, but I just haven’t been able to get it to consistently compete with the tier 1 decks, especially Luxchomp.

    The 3-1 legend lines still make no sense to me. Here’s why:

    Recovery with 3-1: need Rescue and 1 of the 2 remaining top halves
    Recovery with 2-2: need Rescue and 1 of the 2 remaining halves (just Rescue for whichever one you don’t have) OR both of the 2 remaining halves

    The first recovery scenario with 2-2 is exactly the same mathematically as the recovery with 3-1, AND you have another possible scenario that you can use to recover. You also have the potential to get 2 KGLs in play at once should the need arise (dump cards for Uxie, etc.). Unless I’m missing something, I really think that 2-2 is the play.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Bae/583235222 Peter Bae

      I guess with the 3-1, the prizes could just be a little bit better as you will most likely have the top pieces prized, leaving you wit h1~2 in the deck. In 2-2, either one could be prized, forcing you to azelf for the other piece after playing 1 and being KOed maybe? but could be said the same when that 1/60 card (bottom piece) is prized, however, it is less likely.

      • Anonymous

        But, the odds of both of the same piece is lower than the odds of the one in a 3-1 line, so either way, you have less odds of getting one a piece that you HAVE to have in a 2-2 than a 3-1.

        And, for the record, its not really 1 in 60 when calculating the odds of it getting prized. Its more like 1 in 53. If it is in your starting hand, you know it isn’t prized, thus the odds of it being prized is 0 in 53. If it isn’t in your hand, the odds are 1 in 53. So, the odds of it being prized are actually a little higher.

        But, Nick is right, there is absolutely no advantage to running a 3-1, especially not in the scenario you give.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Bae/583235222 Peter Bae

      I guess with the 3-1, the prizes could just be a little bit better as you will most likely have the top pieces prized, leaving you wit h1~2 in the deck. In 2-2, either one could be prized, forcing you to azelf for the other piece after playing 1 and being KOed maybe? but could be said the same when that 1/60 card (bottom piece) is prized, however, it is less likely.

  • Anonymous

    I’m also not a fan of the 3-1. You can do the same thing with rescue with 2-2 that you can with 3-1. You have the same % chance of drawing either part, and can rescue the other half needed.

    The main difference is that you can essentially play your legend 3 times without using any shuffle back supporters. You have 3 of one half in deck, so you can play all 3 of that half while only rescuing the other half. Where as 2-2 you will have to either double rescue both parts once, or shuffle back at least 1-1 for the 3rd play.

    While I get that the 3rd play is easier to pull off (rarely needed IMO, as I feel they will probably get 2 prizes elsewhere during the course of the game more often than not).

    The drawback leaves you with a much higher chance of no legend AND no azelf

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AZ7MP235S56SS6AWRV6ML34KEM dude

    another thing you can do against vilegar (idk if this has been said already) but you can psychic restore once, then hit for 90 with feraligatr. you have to risk the fainting spell but it gets you the easy 2HKO.

  • Anonymous

    I gotta say: I’ve been basically running the deck you described for a few Months, thinking its my own design. I run 3 jirachi and one sableye (seems like a better mix, because Jirachi is key) and i dont run any croconaw: i rare candy to Feraligatr, never been trainer locked out of it for some reason. I run 2-2 KGL, use 2 Palmers instead of FSL, and have a couple Indigo Plateau. Used this deck to beat last years Double City Champion in this years Round One! Great Deck Review! imtheking8@yahoo.com

  • Anonymous

    I gotta say: I’ve been basically running the deck you described for a few Months, thinking its my own design. I run 3 jirachi and one sableye (seems like a better mix, because Jirachi is key) and i dont run any croconaw: i rare candy to Feraligatr, never been trainer locked out of it for some reason. I run 2-2 KGL, use 2 Palmers instead of FSL, and have a couple Indigo Plateau. Used this deck to beat last years Double City Champion in this years Round One! Great Deck Review! imtheking8@yahoo.com