Please login or register in order to rate this article.

You should write for 6P! Click here to get started...

Like Us!

Commenting Etiquette

Be cool. That's all we ask. The writers and editors put a lot of time into bringing you these articles, so show some respect. It's ok to be critical, but please be civil about it. Don't embarrass yourself in front of everyone by making juvenile remarks because you may regret it later. If you have issue with someone, "Get a room." Nobody wants to see your childish back-and-forth banter. Think twice before commenting, use proper grammar, HAVE FUN, and thanks for adding to the conversation!

  • Anonymous

    I would like to say I played my list yesterday and took 2nd place with it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Leo-Sha/100001619858565 Leo Sha

    And I would like to say that I missed a top cut because of a similar list a week ago.

    • Anonymous

      Was that the lists fault or simply bad luck?

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Leo-Sha/100001619858565 Leo Sha

        Probably bad luck as I was running G-Dos w/ Blaziken FB LvX

      • Anonymous

        high five for no dgx iIIIi

    • Anonymous

      I went 1-1 versus Machamp if you had a problem with that. I tried to always have a Garchomp C ready to snipe a bench machop or Machoke and uxie X plus Luario if it’s a Machamp

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Bae/583235222 Peter Bae

    i’ve had tremendous succcess with DialgaChomp this season at BR (not missing a single top cut), and I must say, it is possibly the most complicated decks in the format. I only believe that it hasn’t won many Cities because of the complicated mechanics of the deck and not many people knowing how to play the deck to it’s full potential. As of now, most DialgaChomp build seems to favor 2-1 instead of 3-1 for more tech room also. The only problem I see with the article is the skeleton list and your finished list xD. I think Bronzong G is a must, not a tech, therefore should be included in the skeleton. Also, I never really favored Lucario GL in the deck, but I haven’t played it since, and if Machamp seems to be coming back, wouldn’t be too bad. However, you wrote an amazing article and hope to see more from you :) Good job

    • Anonymous

      Thank you, I should mention that the Lucario GL in my list also played as my only counter to Regigigas xD.

  • Anonymous

    Just don’t see the reasoning behind two call energies. Either you want to start with it or you probably wont need it. So i say four or none. Otherwise great article.

    • Anonymous

      I thought I had that in my article 0-4, Oh well but Call can be great, in fact it got me to Power SPray uxie twice in my matches and late game you can use them for Grachomp C’s Dragon rush discarding.

      • Anonymous

        Unless i missed something you mentioned what call is used for but you did not mention why you are only running two in your deck list.

        Of course call can get you the extra SP turn one so you can power spray right away assuming you have a spray. However, if that is your plan you would want four sprays in your deck.

        I would only advise to run four or none or at least three. If it works for you this way than that’s great as well.

      • http://www.adamcapriola.com/ Adam Capriola

        I removed the line where you said you could use 0 to 4 because you could use 0 to 4 of almost any card in a deck. :P

        I don’t think you mentioned why you use 2 though… but regardless good article. :)

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001734489773 Dakota Streck

      I feel that, since you’d already be running 2-3 Collector, couldn’t four Call be considered a tad overkill, taking your deck up to 7 cards that search for solely basic Pokemon?

      • http://twitter.com/yoyofsho16 Alex Dickens

        Lol that’s bad?
        That’s a near guarantee that you’ll start with a Basic searcher…
        THIS DECK IS 100% BASIC POKEMON
        Plus, Collector are useful later in the game.

      • miguelvic23

        LVX’s aren’t basic pokemon

    • Anonymous

      First thing I was gonna mention was the lack of Call. Bump it up to at least 3, starting with 1 with only 2 isn’t gonna happen too often, and after that they’re just dead draw.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Bae/583235222 Peter Bae

      Agreed, I personally hate call energies.. it is absolutely terrible unless I have like an Unown Q start, no Bebe’s SEarch, SP Radar, Pokemon Collector or any other Pokemon searching card which is like near impossible. Call energy just becomes dead after the initial use. 3~4 Pokemon Collector will easily last you the whole game, Call energy just takes up valuable 4 card tech spot

      • the sidewalk

        “Absolutely terrible” is pretty excessive. If your energy requirements permit colorless energy in a discernible way, Calls are more or less common sense. I agree that it sucks when you draw your first Call on t2 (hah), but being able to use a supporter, then Call at the end of your turn as opposed to being cornered into using Collector for set up is pro. Not sure if someone can debate that. Not that I’m looking for a debate or anything, just had to say something when I read that someone felt a potentially epic card was “absolutely terrible”. However, I also agree with those who say run four or none… or at least Energy Exchanger to make up for the Calls that you’re not running.

      • Anonymous

        2 Energy Exchanger
        2 Call Energy
        Thats what I run, either late game I attach it to garchomp for discard or I exchange it for another energy card needed.

      • Anonymous

        Call is like a hot bipolar woman…sometimes you like her, other times you don’t. But, in all seriousness, I find it hard to fit in Dialga lists and not having any does not hurt *too* much. Plus, it is very expensive fore one of them.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Bae/583235222 Peter Bae

        lol I just never really liked Call Energy despite the love that everyone has towards them. Yes it is great with your Lone Pokemon start, going first, with no Pokemon Searching Supporter in hand. But what are teh chances of you gettin those starts. Let’s Take a Look at SP decks.
        Pokemon Searching tools consists of
        SP Radar
        Pokemon Communication
        Pokemon Collector
        Cyrus’s Conspiracy (which allows you to get SP Radar)
        not to mention the absurd amount of basic count in the deck due to being SP Pokemon. around 15.
        If you take the average number of all the cards, that is total of around 28~32 cards depending on player chocies. So yes, getting a Call energy in there does help you get a consistent start, but you already have half the deck being a 2nd Pokemon anyways. I’d rather make those 4 card room a tech against a deck XD. I never really took in consideration of Prizes either and the fact taht you draw 7 xD

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Martin-Garcia/676689170 Martin Garcia

        You would be surprised to know how many times you can start with a lone uxie/azelf/bronzong g/lucario gl/crobat etc, and no supporter at all.
        Call energy is needed in sp, but as many said before, its 4(maybe 3 if you cant fit the 4th one) or nothing. I dont particularly like it in dialga, just because the deck already runs so many different and more important special energies, like DCE, warp and sp metals.
        Also, its true that top decking a call late game is not all that impressive, but with garchomp, dragonite, ambipom, luxray, blaziken, crobat, and staraptor all having a colorless cost, i would say its not so bad, its also important to know when to save your e-gains for a surprise counter.
        Finally, call can get you out of sticky situations against trainer lock, if you play a consistency starter like chatot or smeargle, i have done it lots of times when my hand was totally crap.

    • Anonymous

      Pros:
      Search for 2 pokemon for a Power SPray if you go first.
      Can be used with SP Radar to search out SP Pokes
      Can be used to search out pokemon with bebe’s Search
      Can be exchange by playing Energy Exchanger
      Used as discard for Dragon Rush
      1 energy for any pokemon in the deck needing any energy for attack cost
      Cons:
      Takes up deck space

  • Anonymous

    Congrats on your first Article! It was great.

  • http://twitter.com/yoyofsho16 Alex Dickens

    Staraptor isn’t even that good without a Stadium.
    I also don’t get how you are beating other Sp’s with only 1 Dragonite FB and 2-2 Chomp…

    • Anonymous

      Sadly there wasn’t even one SP at the event other than me running it, every thing was Gyarados, regigigas, and Machamp plus tons of Rogue.Staraptor is only used for getting a Supporter, i never even use it to attack.

  • the sidewalk

    Why so little regular metals? I would think that whiffing on drawing energy would set this deck back a lot. Being able to Cyrus for energies is at least 30 percent of what makes the SP engine as viable as it is. I’m honestly really curious about this and not objecting for the sake of objecting. hahah

    • Anonymous

      I ended up taking a basic metal out because even when searched I always seemed to have it in my hand not being used and I honestly get the energy I need when i need it

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for the 1,000 views on my first article, didn’t think I would reach that many, the goal was 500.

    • http://www.adamcapriola.com/ Adam Capriola

      Congrats man!

  • Brandon Jones

    Nice article. Especially since it is your first.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Nilay-Patel/100000072319058 Nilay Patel

    Awesome article. I would take out one Uxie, both call energies, and add a premier ball and two proffesor oaks new theory.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_445NRBQJW5UEAJ52HXIIEX5CAM Dominick

    that was ok, but not the best article ive seen on this site