Is there a card YOU want to see reviewed? Request the next COTD!

Please login or register in order to rate this article.

You should write for 6P! Click here to get started...

Like Us!

Commenting Etiquette

Be cool. That's all we ask. The writers and editors put a lot of time into bringing you these articles, so show some respect. It's ok to be critical, but please be civil about it. Don't embarrass yourself in front of everyone by making juvenile remarks because you may regret it later. If you have issue with someone, "Get a room." Nobody wants to see your childish back-and-forth banter. Think twice before commenting, use proper grammar, HAVE FUN, and thanks for adding to the conversation!

  • http://www.legendarypokemon.net/ NM2

    “…Pidgeot’s rarity, which is something I’ve never really touched upon in my reviews. While being an Uncommon has nothing to do with the viability of Pidgeot…”

    Pidgeot was rare last time I checked. ;)
    Plus, the 3/5 rating seems way higher than it should be. It’s not just the fact that you can’t abuse Headwind’s effect with the presence of SP. We’re playing in a format where you’re supposed to get a KO every turn or at least stop your opponent from doing so, attacks that hit for 20 and 40 with easily avoidable effects won’t get you anywhere. Pidgeot should beg for a HGSS-on format in order to become useful. In this format, I’d give it a 1-1.5/5, even if you want to play a Colorless Stage-2, Garchomp SV and Flygon are both better in my opinion.

  • Anonymous

    Every new card released has a 2x weakness now, so thats not totally terrible. Great review nonetheless.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QUZWVSW2CASB3P4W7FYKATTV6U UberP

    Ohhh….. I definitely think that I just realized that Pidgeot would be good with Machamp against Stage 2 decks with possibly Vileplume. I know it’s 3 stage 2′s but It could still work.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000339533865 Alexander DuPrey

    Imagine a Spiritomb’s Darkness Grace Costing CC

  • Anonymous

    I wanted so badly for this to be good, but it’s just not. You can use it once, Defending attaches, passes. You use it again. Defending attaches and is back in business, and you’ve done a whole 40 damage. The damage output is just too low. There could be some cool combos to prevent retreat, but I can’t see it working well.

  • http://twitter.com/sghirst Sophie Grace Hirst

    A notable example that highlights how ridiculous your 3/5 rating for Pidgeot is (and a little note asking readers to not take that rating as Bible does not change that) would be the fact that you had rated Yanmega Prime 2/5. It leaves me to suspect that the reason you gave such an inflated score may either be as juvenile as a personal liking for the Pokemon in question, or as pathetic as a desire to be controversial and different.

    If recognition is what you desire, I suggest constructing an article that does not follow your usual, boring format. Furthermore, it would be wise to not give unconstructive criticism to other writers who do have the imagination to submit an article a little out of the ordinary (e.g. ‘The Art if Losing’).

    While I admire the sheer volume of articles you submit, I fear it has become a substitute for quality.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001734489773 Dakota Streck

      Wrong on both counts, I’m afraid. I don’t have a personal liking for Pidgeot (Pidgeot FRLG was an awesome card, though) nor am I trying to be controversial. I admit that I try to be different, but I would never do so in such a manner as to inflate a rating beyond that of what I believe to be the card’s true value for the sake of getting recognition.

      As for the format in which I write the COTDs in which you’re questioning, I don’t have too much of a problem with it. I review the basics of the card (HP, Weakness, Retreat Cost, etc) then move onto the Poke-Things and Attacks. I round it off by talking about potential combos with the card, how I believe it will affect the format, etc.

      Finally, I drop my recommendation on the card along with the rating. I appreciate that COTDs can get a little repetitive at times, I assure you that I put an extraordinary amount of effort into writing both Articles and COTDs. However, both you and I need to accept that no matter how much effort/hard you try, every single submission won’t be perfect and not everyone will agree with what you say.

      I thank you for dropping your opinion, though. I will take what you said to heart and use it to improve the cotds to the best of my ability.

      • http://twitter.com/sghirst Sophie Grace Hirst

        A dignified response. I commend you for taking note of my suggestions, even if they did seem a little harsh.

        Continuing from my previous point, may I ask how you justify giving Pidgeot a rating of 3/5 when Yanmega Prime only received 2/5? In other words, how is Pidgeot a better card/more feasible than Yanmega Prime?

      • Anonymous

        I think its better because of Pidgeot’s “Headwind”, Pidgeot is easier to set up, and Pidgeot is great for disruption.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001734489773 Dakota Streck

        Yeah, Epic_Win1 is pretty close to the mark. Neither Pidgeot nor Yanmega are in their ideal format. Pidgeot is less effective because of all the SP Pokemon, Warp Energies and Free Retreat Cost attackers in the format (IE Gengar, etc). Both Yanmega and Pidgeot has to deal with a x2 Lightning Weakness, which is Luxray GL Lv.X and Magnezone prime, as well as the other Magnezones, Luxrays, etc.

        Perhaps 3/5 is too high for the situation right now, but what I was trying to suggest within my cotd was more a prediction for the future over what the current situation at hand reflects upon Pidgeot.

        As for Yanmega, I know people think it is better than I said, but I still disagree. I don’t think it’s a good card at all. I realize I get a lot of hate for believing that, but I can’t adjust my opinion on a card because others don’t believe in it. I just think the format is way too stacked against it and it takes way too much effort to set up attacks that are only average.

        I plan to keep an eye on both Yanmega and Pidgeot. They’re both very useful cards that will be in our format for at least 1-2 more years, so I’d be will to bet that the meta game will eventually come to a point or something will be released that will give them a better chance.

        Finally, I believe Pidgeot to be the more useful of the two because, like I’ve been saying, the format isn’t stacked against it so much. Neither is exactly Tier 1 and I think most people agree with me on that, I just think Pidgeot is better than Yanmega in the current format (also, Pidgeot can hit Garchomp C for weakness, which is a nice bonus).

        Hopefully I address all of your questions, it’s such a long post, sometimes I forget them all. :)

      • http://twitter.com/sghirst Sophie Grace Hirst

        We shall agree to disagree, although I do understand your point of view, and am thankful that you gave such a detailed answer to my query.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001734489773 Dakota Streck

        np

  • Anonymous

    I agree that your rating is too high, I really liked your article though (and your other ones too). You are doing a great job.