<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worth a Look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/</link>
	<description>Share, read, and discuss Pokemon Trading Card Game tips and strategy with the SixPrizes community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissia Winkler</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/#comment-16344</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissia Winkler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/?p=4897#comment-16344</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing your story, that helped me a lot to do research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing your story, that helped me a lot to do research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrinkle serum</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/#comment-15022</link>
		<dc:creator>wrinkle serum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/?p=4897#comment-15022</guid>
		<description>I am really joyfulto see that you are putting so much of effortfor cheeringthe readers with valueable posts like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really joyfulto see that you are putting so much of effortfor cheeringthe readers with valueable posts like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Full Movie Downloads</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/#comment-13780</link>
		<dc:creator>Full Movie Downloads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 06:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/?p=4897#comment-13780</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info, I am going to be checking in..thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info, I am going to be checking in..thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mantidactyle</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/#comment-8087</link>
		<dc:creator>Mantidactyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/?p=4897#comment-8087</guid>
		<description>This use is really interesting, but with 3~4 power spray in the deck, the odds that the opponent draws one of &#039;em in his new hand are not negligible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This use is really interesting, but with 3~4 power spray in the deck, the odds that the opponent draws one of &#39;em in his new hand are not negligible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mantidactyle</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/#comment-5923</link>
		<dc:creator>Mantidactyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/?p=4897#comment-5923</guid>
		<description>This use is really interesting, but with 3~4 power spray in the deck, the odds that the opponent draws one of &#039;em in his new hand are not negligible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This use is really interesting, but with 3~4 power spray in the deck, the odds that the opponent draws one of &#39;em in his new hand are not negligible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkStroup</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/#comment-5900</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkStroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/?p=4897#comment-5900</guid>
		<description>Great article!&lt;br&gt;Lookers certainly is over&quot;looked&quot; in a lot of cases, but the one reason why I like to side with Team Galactic&#039;s Wager a BIT more, is only because you&#039;re affecting BOTH hands, meaning when you play Lookers, you blow your Supporter drop basically on just forcing your opponent to draw more cards while you get no benefit out of it besides that. &lt;br&gt;Once you absolutely KNOW that that Gliscor LvX is in their hand, or you can just figure that Gyarados has some Pokemon Rescues in their hand by now after they did Felicity&#039;s three times, it&#039;s sometimes better just to make the assumption.&lt;br&gt;-Lookers gives them 5 cards&lt;br&gt;-You get nothing but the knowledge they had key cards in their hand, which they MAY get back next turn via Bebes, etc.&lt;br&gt;-TGW could give them only 3 or 6, and even if you&#039;re getting only 3, at least you&#039;re still getting something out of it, besides the assumption they had in their hand what they needed.&lt;br&gt;Very critically thought article, I enjoyed it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!<br />Lookers certainly is over&#8221;looked&#8221; in a lot of cases, but the one reason why I like to side with Team Galactic&#39;s Wager a BIT more, is only because you&#39;re affecting BOTH hands, meaning when you play Lookers, you blow your Supporter drop basically on just forcing your opponent to draw more cards while you get no benefit out of it besides that. <br />Once you absolutely KNOW that that Gliscor LvX is in their hand, or you can just figure that Gyarados has some Pokemon Rescues in their hand by now after they did Felicity&#39;s three times, it&#39;s sometimes better just to make the assumption.<br />-Lookers gives them 5 cards<br />-You get nothing but the knowledge they had key cards in their hand, which they MAY get back next turn via Bebes, etc.<br />-TGW could give them only 3 or 6, and even if you&#39;re getting only 3, at least you&#39;re still getting something out of it, besides the assumption they had in their hand what they needed.<br />Very critically thought article, I enjoyed it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pikkdogs</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/#comment-5843</link>
		<dc:creator>pikkdogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/?p=4897#comment-5843</guid>
		<description>Yeah Lookers is a good card, but there a lot of supporters like it so it gets lost in the mix.  Plus supporter draws shouldnt be used for drawing, thats what claydols for.  So people tend not to play it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like team galactics wager.  But the problem is that I do a lot of testing by myself, and its really hard to play rochambeau against yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Lookers is a good card, but there a lot of supporters like it so it gets lost in the mix.  Plus supporter draws shouldnt be used for drawing, thats what claydols for.  So people tend not to play it.</p>
<p>I like team galactics wager.  But the problem is that I do a lot of testing by myself, and its really hard to play rochambeau against yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nardd</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/#comment-5842</link>
		<dc:creator>nardd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/?p=4897#comment-5842</guid>
		<description>I firmly support lookers.  I remember at my cities in TX I played a Gyarados deck with my Garchomp SV.  The game was not going well for me, but I happened to pull an upper energy at the best time so that I could do 120 to the Gyarados (which knocked it out) right after using my 1 lookers in the deck, giving me an opportunity to get caught up and secure the win for that round, just like you mentioned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s also nice for a simple hand refresh when you just need another hand.  The beauty of Lookers that you didn&#039;t seem to directly mention is its versatility.  If you asked me which I prefer - Lookers or Wager - I&#039;d say Lookers because of its ability to be so versatile depending on the game-state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I firmly support lookers.  I remember at my cities in TX I played a Gyarados deck with my Garchomp SV.  The game was not going well for me, but I happened to pull an upper energy at the best time so that I could do 120 to the Gyarados (which knocked it out) right after using my 1 lookers in the deck, giving me an opportunity to get caught up and secure the win for that round, just like you mentioned.</p>
<p>It&#39;s also nice for a simple hand refresh when you just need another hand.  The beauty of Lookers that you didn&#39;t seem to directly mention is its versatility.  If you asked me which I prefer &#8211; Lookers or Wager &#8211; I&#39;d say Lookers because of its ability to be so versatile depending on the game-state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bittyboy72</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/#comment-5841</link>
		<dc:creator>bittyboy72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 04:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/?p=4897#comment-5841</guid>
		<description>Nice article, but I agree with Adam 1 or 2 is good for a deck!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On a completely separate note, I like how this article gets like 14 comments and the few in front of it have about 2!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, but I agree with Adam 1 or 2 is good for a deck!  </p>
<p>On a completely separate note, I like how this article gets like 14 comments and the few in front of it have about 2!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb2si</title>
		<link>http://www.sixprizes.com/card-of-the-day/lookers-investigation-platinum-pl-109/#comment-5837</link>
		<dc:creator>bb2si</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sixprizes.com/?p=4897#comment-5837</guid>
		<description>Actually that Poke-Power is a choice. Of course you&#039;d probably use it, but just putting it out there that it is still a choice to use it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually that Poke-Power is a choice. Of course you&#39;d probably use it, but just putting it out there that it is still a choice to use it. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

