Is there a card YOU want to see reviewed? Request the next COTD!

Please login or register in order to rate this article.

You should write for 6P! Click here to get started...

Like Us!

Commenting Etiquette

Be cool. That's all we ask. The writers and editors put a lot of time into bringing you these articles, so show some respect. It's ok to be critical, but please be civil about it. Don't embarrass yourself in front of everyone by making juvenile remarks because you may regret it later. If you have issue with someone, "Get a room." Nobody wants to see your childish back-and-forth banter. Think twice before commenting, use proper grammar, HAVE FUN, and thanks for adding to the conversation!

  • Anonymous

    Also helps Magnezone decks obviously, although in testing, not 100% necessary depending on build.

    Cheren was cut from BW, so that’s not coming unfortunately.

    Other than that, other options missed are things like Professor Oak’s Visit (Not actually that bad, best solid drawpower atm imo), and Sage’s Training (meh, some decks like it I guess)

    • Anonymous

      It was tempting to compare it to cards like POTN or Cynthia’s Feelings, but I decided that those were hand refresh instead of draw power. I decided to rate it more based on wanting to keep cards than get new ones.

      • Anonymous

        Not Pont, Professor Oak’s Visit lets you draw three cards and put one card from hand to the bottom of the deck. I understand this article is more about pure drawpower than refresh.

      • Anonymous

        Oh wow. I totally misread that, and forgot about that card. Cheren’s gonna be the top dog when it hits USA/UK, I think.

      • Anonymous

        What’s wrong with Emcee, it guarantees a draw with hardly any downside, or Team Rocket’s Trickery, it’s disruptive and no downside for the user.

  • Anonymous

    I think the rating might be a 3 or 3.5/5 because it really only works in some decks, like charizard, steelix, and some magnezone. When sp does get rotated and the format slows down a lot it could make the decks I mentioned become a lot better. Thats all I think you might disagree and thats fine.

  • Anonymous

    I think we need to get some kind of card rating standard going. I enjoy the Cotd and this was a typically good read. However, there seems to be no rhyme or reason to the ratings cards get. 4/5 for a card that is only good in certain decks doesn’t seem to warrant that kind of rating. I personally don’t care about the rating most of the time, but new readers might be confused. Especially when other cards that are better received lower ratings (rhyperior lvl x, Lucario COL, Aarons Collection etc.

    • Anonymous

      it’s based on the opinion of the reviewer, and in my opinion, it’s better than Rhyperior Lv.X, Lucario CL, and Aaron’s Collection.

    • Anonymous

      it’s based on the opinion of the reviewer, and in my opinion, it’s better than Rhyperior Lv.X, Lucario CL, and Aaron’s Collection.

      • Anonymous

        better than rhy x whaat

  • Anonymous

    Random suggestion for a rating scheme:

    0 = This card is utter garbage. It can’t be used in any deck
    1 = This card is pretty crappy. It may only work as a tech for a tech, but it’s definitely not meta. Also, evolving basic that just isn’t that good.
    2 = Decent card, but it doesn’t see any competitive play because it’s meta. Might make it to the league, but you won’t see it at a tournament.
    3 = Decent tech in specific decks. It may not fit in every deck, but the deck it does fit in it fits well in.
    4 = Required card for specific deck. It doesn’t go in every deck, but it is absolutely essential to making the deck it is in function in the meta.
    5 = This card is in every single deck. If you’re not playing it, you’re an idiot.

    • Anonymous

      If it doesn’t help anyone else, it definitely helps me, as I am known for my crappy rating system. :P Live & learn, I guess. :P Thanks!

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AHE7W74T3ZL5RFLI4R2B7A6ZIQ Alex Holdway

      So a potential 5 cards to fit on that list (just springing to mind) could be:
      0 = Spinda SV
      1 = Good Rod UL
      2 = Nidoking TM
      3 = Blissey Prime
      4 = Vileplume UD
      5 = Pokemon Collector

      Not trying to start a debate about the cards I picked, but it’s a good comparison for your suggestions. This would make this card about a 2.8 ~ just a bit worse than Blissey Prime.

      :D

    • Anonymous

      I agree with your rating system, and I want to bring up a vote to put it in place. Shall we do so by voting on the post where he placed the rating system? I believe that would be fair.